Subaru EyeSight Settlement: Subaru EyeSight Settlement is more than just a headline — it’s the result of years of legal back-and-forth over one of Subaru’s most promoted technologies: the EyeSight driver-assist system. The lawsuit, filed by frustrated car owners, claimed the very technology designed to protect them on the road was causing unexpected issues. And now, after a long legal road, Subaru agreed to settle the claims, offering select U.S. owners extended warranty relief and partial reimbursements. If you drive a Subaru from certain model years and it came equipped with EyeSight, this guide breaks down exactly what the settlement was, what was offered, and what you could — or could have — received. And yes, we’ll also clear up the confusion about the so-called $5,000 payouts you might’ve seen floating around online.
Table of Contents
Subaru EyeSight Settlement
The Subaru EyeSight Settlement is a classic example of how class-action lawsuits can pressure automakers into making things right — or at least better — for affected consumers. While no blanket $5,000 checks were issued to every owner, those who took the time to file and confirm eligibility may have received hundreds of dollars back or avoided costly repairs. Even if the deadline has passed, the case is a lesson in being proactive, saving records, and understanding the fine print behind your car’s safety features. For professionals in the auto industry, it’s a reminder that customer trust in advanced safety tech is fragile — and transparency matters.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Settlement Name | Subaru EyeSight Class‑Action Settlement |
| Official Website | https://www.eyesightsettlement.com/ |
| Case Number | Sampson, et al. v. Subaru of America, Inc., No. 1:21‑cv‑10284‑ESK‑SAK |
| Eligible Vehicles | 2013–2024 models of Subaru Legacy, Outback, Impreza, Crosstrek, Forester, Ascent, WRX, BRZ with EyeSight |
| Main Benefits | Extended warranty for EyeSight repairs (75%), 75% reimbursement of one qualifying past repair |
| Claim Deadline | September 27, 2025 (now passed) |
| Total Payouts to Lead Plaintiffs | $5,000 each (not general compensation) |
| Legal Fees Approved | $2.4 million |
| Settlement Administrator | Angeion Group |
What Is the Subaru EyeSight Settlement?
Subaru’s EyeSight system was promoted as a breakthrough in safety: a suite of features that included adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, pre-collision braking, and automatic emergency steering. These features rely on a forward-facing camera system and sonar sensors to read road conditions and help the car make smarter driving decisions.
But EyeSight didn’t always perform as expected. The class-action lawsuit filed in 2021 alleged that:
- The pre-collision braking system would falsely activate or fail to engage when needed.
- Lane keep assist would malfunction, veer off, or disengage without warning.
- Repairs were costly and often not covered under warranty.
Subaru denied any wrongdoing but agreed to a settlement to resolve the claims without admitting fault. That’s common in class actions — it avoids trial while allowing affected consumers some compensation.
Vehicles Included in the Subaru EyeSight Settlement
Only certain model years were part of the case. Eligibility was determined by Subaru and included the following models if equipped with EyeSight:
- 2013–2022 Subaru Legacy
- 2013–2022 Subaru Outback
- 2015–2023 Subaru Impreza
- 2015–2023 Subaru Crosstrek
- 2014–2021 Subaru Forester
- 2019–2022 Subaru Ascent
- 2016–2021 Subaru WRX
- 2022–2024 Subaru BRZ
Important: Just owning one of these models doesn’t mean you were covered. Subaru provided a specific list of VINs. Owners had to visit the settlement website and enter their VIN to confirm eligibility. No VIN, no claim.
What Owners Actually Received: Not $5,000 for Everyone?
Let’s bust the biggest myth right away: not every Subaru owner got $5,000. That amount was awarded only to the nine lead plaintiffs who initiated and helped pursue the lawsuit. Each of them received $5,000 incentive awards for their time, effort, and risk in leading the case.
General Subaru owners had two possible benefits:
1. Extended Warranty Coverage
Subaru extended the warranty on EyeSight-related repairs for eligible vehicles. Here’s how it worked:
- Coverage extended to 4 years or 48,000 miles, whichever came first, from the car’s original in-service date.
- Subaru would cover 75% of the parts and labor cost of one qualified EyeSight system repair.
- This included issues with the front-facing stereo camera system or rear sonar sensors.
If your vehicle was older and the original warranty had already expired, you still got a 4-month repair window starting July 29, 2025.
This benefit was automatically available — owners didn’t need to file a claim to access it.
2. Reimbursement for Past Repairs
If you previously paid out of pocket for a qualifying EyeSight repair, you could file a reimbursement claim for 75% of that cost — but only one repair per vehicle.
You needed to file:
- A repair invoice detailing the parts and labor.
- Proof you paid for the work.
- VIN and mileage at the time of repair.
- Description confirming the repair was related to the EyeSight system.
Deadline to file this reimbursement claim: September 27, 2025 (now passed).
The Legal Side: Class Certification and Administration
The lawsuit, Sampson v. Subaru of America, was filed in U.S. District Court in New Jersey. It alleged violations of consumer protection laws, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. Subaru chose not to contest class certification and instead moved to settlement discussions.
Angeion Group, a trusted settlement administrator, handled the outreach, website, and claim processing. Court records show over 1 million owners were notified, either via mail or electronically.
Subaru also agreed to pay:
- Up to $2.4 million in attorney’s fees
- Administrative costs (mailing, claims processing, etc.)
- The $5,000 incentive awards to lead plaintiffs
These costs came out of Subaru’s pockets — they didn’t reduce the owner benefits.
Why Subaru EyeSight Settlement Matters Beyond Subaru?
This case highlights a few trends:
- Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) like EyeSight are becoming standard. But more tech = more possible failure points.
- Consumers are increasingly aware of software bugs, false alerts, and erratic behavior in these systems.
- Lawsuits like this may push automakers to offer longer warranties and better support for ADAS technology.
- Other automakers, including Tesla and Honda, have faced similar lawsuits over braking and lane assistance systems.
With autonomous driving around the corner, legal accountability for semi-autonomous tech is only heating up.
Lessons for Subaru Owners (and Other Car Buyers)
Whether you owned a Subaru or not, here are some practical takeaways:
1. Always Save Repair Receipts:
If you ever get a mysterious system warning or need an expensive repair, keep your paperwork. It might be the golden ticket in a future class-action.
2. Know Your Warranty Terms:
Many owners assumed EyeSight repairs were fully covered under warranty — but often they were not. Read the fine print and confirm coverage before approving repairs.
3. Register Your Vehicle with the Manufacturer:
Subaru used VIN data to contact class members. If your vehicle wasn’t registered, you may have missed the notification. Always keep your info updated.
4. Monitor Class Action Websites:
Websites like classaction.org and topclassactions.com post active settlements. You can sign up for alerts and check eligibility in minutes.
Infosys McCamish Wins Final Approval for $17.5 Million Class Action Settlement – Check Details
$2,500 Cash App Settlement in 2026; Check If You’re Eligible and When You’ll Get Paid
Google’s $700M Settlement, Explained: Eligibility, Deadlines, and Payouts
